```php A Review Analysis Corporate Governance and Insider Ownership | Abstract IJTBM

International Journal of Transformations in Business Management

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN : 2231-6868 | P-ISSN : 2454-468X

IMPACT FACTOR : 5.987 | SJIF 2020: 6.336 | ICV 2020=66.47

+91 9555269393 | +91 9311631393   info@ijtbm.com


Abstract

A Review Analysis Corporate Governance and Insider Ownership

Dr Prakash Chandra Vaish

Associate Professor and Head, Dept of Commerce, Government College, Todarpur, Hardoi

100-115 Vol: 11, Issue: 1, 2021
Receiving Date: 2021-02-21
Acceptance Date: 2021-03-03
Publication Date: 2021-03-21
Download PDF

Abstract

Corporate governance is concerned with aligning the interests of investors and managers and in
ensuring that firms are run for the benefit of all classes of investors. In broader sense however
good governance the extent to which co.’s are run in an open & honest manner creates overall
confidence entrances efficiency of international capital allocation and contribute ultimately to the
nation’s overall wealth & welfare. (The overall importance of corporate Governance should
governance be concerned with protecting the interests of all stake holders or only one class of
stake holders i.e. share holders. The role contribution of the independent directors for good
governance is high highlighted.) Noticing the situation it is the time that the corporate world &
civil Society need to take a more active role in ensuring the restructuring & Transformation of
governance

Keywords: Good Governance; Interests of Investors and Managers; Corporate Governance

References

  1. Baker, M. (2006). Private communication, Business in the Community, 29 March.
  2. Brewster, D. (2004). ‘CalPERS wave-making brings flak’, Financial Times Fund Management, 9 August
  3. Business Week (2004). ‘Special report: corporate governance, investors fight back’, 17 May
  4. Butz, C. (2003). Decomposing SRI Performance, Geneva, Pictet & Cie.
  5. Cadbury Committee (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London, Financial Reporting Council.
  6. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great, London, Random House Business Books.
  7. Collins, J. and Porras, J. (1994). Built to Last, New York, Harper Business.
  8. Conference Board (2003). ‘Commission on public trust and private enterprise: findings and recommendations’, New York, Conference Board Inc.
  9. Gimbel, F. (2004). ‘US activist launches hedge fund (for corporate governance)’, FT Fund Management, 19 April.
  10. Institute of Business Ethics (2003). Does Business Ethics Pay: Ethics and Financial Performance, London, Institute of Business Ethics.
  11. Larcker, D., Richardson, S. and Tuna, I. (2005). Ratings add fire to the governance debate’, FT Mastering Corporate Governance, 2 May.
  12. Los Angeles Times (2004a). Ex- exec tells of Adelphia fraud’, 3 April. Gompers, P., Ishii, J. and Metrick, A. (2001). ‘Corporate Governance and Equity Prices’, Washington, NBER Working Paper no. 8449.
  13. ICGN (2002). Cross Border Proxy Voting, Case Studies from the 2002 Proxy Voting Season, London, International Corporate Governance Network.
  14. . IFAC (2003). Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting: An International Perspective, New York, International Federation of Accountants.
  15. IFAC (2004). Enterprise Governance: Getting the Balance Right, New York, International Federation of Accountants.
  16. McKinsey & Company (2002). Global Investor Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance, London, McKinsey & Company.
  17. Standard & Poor's Governance Services (2002). Corporate Governance Scores: Criteria, Methodology and Definitions, New York, Standard and Poor's.
  18. UNCTAD (2003). ‘Case study on corporate governance disclosures in the United States of America’, Geneva: TD/B/Com.2/ISAR/19/ Add.5, 31 July.
  19. UNCTAD (2005). 2005 Review of the Implementation Status of Corporate Governance Disclosures’, Geneva: TD/B/COM.2/ISAR/ CRP.1, 17 November.
Back

```