Vol: 2, Issue: 2 2012

Page: 1-7

SURVEY ON “PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF DECISION MAKING STYLES”

Neeru Salaria

Received Date: 2012-02-09

Accepted Date: 2012-03-08

Published Date: 2012-04-05

Ecker (1968) conducted a study of personality factors as predictors of administrative behaviour and found no significant relationship was found to exist between democratic-autocratic principal administrative behaviour and traditional-emergent principal value orientation. When the relationship between democratic-autocratic principal administrative behaviour and personality was assessed the F- values were too low to be considered significant.

References

• Allport, G.W. (1948), �Personality � A Psychological Interpretation.� New York: Holt, 1948.
• Arnold, Fredrick Charles (1978), �An Investigation of Educational Administrative Style and Job Satisfaction of Elementary School Principals.� Diss. Abst. Int. � A, 38:5, p. 2455.
• Askar, B.G. (2009), �Characteristics of a Good Principal in Secondary Schools.� Yemen Times, Issue No-14010. Published 12.08.2009. updated 29.03.2011.
• Awasthi, J.N. (1981), �Administrative Problems of Principals of Affiliated Colleges of Avadh University�, Faizabad, Ph.D. Edu., Avadh University..
• Babaoglan, E.(2010), �An Examination of Leadership Competencies of School Principals in Turky and United States.� Education and Science, 35 (158), 2010.
• Baliya J.N. (2007), �A Study of Administrative Styles of Principals of Colleges of Education�. Indian Journal of Psychomentry and Education, 38(1), 21-25
• Begley, P.T. (2004), �Democratic School Leadership in Canada?s Public School System: Professional Value and Social Ethic.� Journal of Educational Administration, 42 (6), 640- 655.
• Begley, P.T. and Leithwoood, K.A. (2004) �The influence of value on school administrator practices� Journal of personnel evaluation in education,3 (4), 1990 springerlink date November, 04, 2004)
• Best, John W. and Kahn, J.V. (2007), Research in Education, New Delhi, Prentice Hall of India Private
• Blai,Jr. B.(1982), �Editing Job-Satisfaction �. From ERIC ,Vol.17,No.5-Document Reproduction Service .No. ED-210582.
• Brooke, S.L. (2010), �Leadership and Job Satisfaction. �Academic Leaderhship. 8(4).
• Calabrese, R.L. (2006), �Charactes, School Leadership and the Brain : Learning How to Integrate Knowledge with Behavioural change.� International Journal of Educational Management, 16 (5), 229-238.
• Campbell, R.F.,Bridges, E.M. & Nystrand,R.O.(1977), �Introduction to Educational Administration.� London. Allyn And Bacon, Inc., 1977, pp.293-294
• Compbell, R.F., Bridges, E.M. & Nystrand, R.O. (1977), �Introduction to Educational Administration.� London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1977, pp293-294.
• High School Assistant Principals and the Time Spent on the care Tasks They Perform.� Diss. Abst. Int. � A, 40: 11, p.5662.
• Das Mamota (1990) A Study of Secondary School Princpals Administrative Behaviour in Relation to School, Climate, The Progress of Education Vol. XXXII pp. 43-47.
• Das, M (1983) A Study of the Administrated Behaviour of Secondary School Principals in Relation to Selected School Variables, Ph.D. Edu. MSU.
• De, Nobile, J. (2003), �Organizational Communication, Job Satisfaction and Occupational Stress in
• Dempsey, Charies Nathan (1973), �Patterns of Effective and Ineffective Behaviour of Elementary School Principals as Perceived by a Selected Group of Classroom Teachers in Virginia.� Diss. Abst. Int. � A, 33 : 1, p. 3181
• Dempster, N. (2004), �Conflicts, Confusions and Contradictions in Principals? ethical Decision Making.� Journal of Educational Administration, 42 (4), 450-461.
• Derlin, R. William Heinemann Ltd., 1970, p24. Organization.� Leadership, 2 (1), 77-99
• Forsyth, P.B. & Adams, C.M. (2006), �Trust-Effectiveness Patterns in Schools.� Journal of Educatonal Administration, 44 (2), 122-141.
• Fouske, J.R. (2002), �Preparing School Leaders: Understanding, Experiencing and Implementing as Managers in Greece : 15 Years Later.� Gender in Management : An International Journal, 24 (7), 484-504.
• Graham, M.W. and Messner, P.E. (1998), �Principals and Job Satisfaction� International journal of educational management, Vol. 12, No-5, 1998, page 196-202.
• Green, L. (2010), �The Four Dimensions of Principal Leadership.� New York: Allyn and Bacon
• Grewal, J.S. 1988. A study of the perceptions of the secondary school learning environment by the students, staff and administrators. Independent study. Bhopal Regional College of Education.
• Griffith, J. (2001), �Principal Leadership of Parent Involvement �Journal of Educational Adm, 39 (2), 162-186.
• Gronn, P (2008), �The Future of Distributed Leadership.� Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2), 141-158.
• Harp, Thomas Young (1972), �The Perception of Selected Characteristics as Related to the Job of Senior High School Principal as Stated by the Superintendent, the School Board President, the Senior High School Principals and the Senior High School Teacher.� Diss. Abst. Int. � A, 33 : 3, p. 924.
• Harris. A. (2005), �Leading from the Chalk-Face: An Overview of School Leadership.� Leadership, 1 (1), 73-87.
• Hemphill, John K., David E. Griffits and Norman Frederiksen (1962), Administrative Performance and Personality. New York : Teachers College, Columbia University.
• Hertzberg,F.,Mausner,R.O. & Snyderman, B.B.(1959), �Motivation to Work�.Newyork,Viley.
• IABR & ITLC Conference Proceedings IER Kohat University (KUST) Orldndo, FL, USA.
• Jack son, M.P. (1999), �The Role of Head of Department In Managing Performance in UK Universities.�
• Jayajothi, K.V. (1992) Organizational Climate and Leadership Behavior of Principals in Relation to Teacher Morale. In Central Schools. M.Phil, Edu. Annamalai Univ. hip in Georgia as Observed by Supervising Teacher.� Diss. Abst. Int. �A, 40:4, p. 1787.
• Klein, J. (2002), �Prediction of Success for School Principal Candidates by means of a DecisionMaking Test.� Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (2), 48-135.
• ir Perception and Management of School Problems.� Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (5), 498-523.
• Lawson, J.S. (1994), �Success and Failure among Senior Public Administrator � The Key Role of Personality.� International Journal of Career Management, 6 (4), 10-13.
• Levin, I.P., Jasper, J.D. (2000): Information Processing at Successive Stage of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion-Exclusion Effects. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision
• Marince, Suzana Louise (1970), Selected Personal Characteristics and Effectiveness of Second Level Site Administrators in the Department of Southern California.� Diss. Abst. Int. �A, 39: 1, p. 53